Scroll Top
10 Old Grimsbury Rd, Banbury OX16 3HG, UK

22747 Accounting for Managerial Decisions

Assessment 1: Assignment (Individual) – Part B, Practical

Task overview

This individual assignment will require you to choose an Australian publicly listed mining development company from a provided list and then to undertake an analysis of the company’s flagship project valuation as well as making investment recommendations based on both information provided by the company as well as more broadly available in the market.

For your chosen mining development project, please complete the following tasks, summarized in an executive summary of no more than 10 pages (excluding appendices).


BCI Minerals Ltd, an Australian organization involved in mining and exploration, is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) with the trading code “BCI”. The enterprise mainly centres on the Mardie Salt & Potash Project in Western Australia, intending to cultivate significant mineral resources. Nestled on the Western Australian coastline, the Mardie Project offers prodigious potential. Considerable strides have been made by BCI Minerals, including the culmination of a conclusive feasibility study (DFS), underscoring its commercial feasibility. The Mardie Project bears considerable prospects for BCI Minerals as the DFS discloses its potential to rank among the globe’s most expansive salt and potash endeavours, boasting a mining lifespan of over 50 years. The company’s commitment to sustainable methodologies is evident with environmental endorsements in place. BCI Minerals has maintained an active dialogue with several stakeholders, including potential off-take associates, to propel the project’s development stage. While the search results lacked specifics about other projects in BCI Minerals’ portfolio, the enterprise’s dedication to responsible mining practices and drive to develop projects with environmental mindfulness reflects its unwavering commitment to sustainability.

Part A 1

BCI Minerals Ltd Project Background:

BCI Minerals Ltd, an organization focused on mining and exploration, principally directs its efforts towards developing mineral assets. It’s operational across numerous locations within Western Australia, and its shares are publicly traded under the ticker symbol “BCI” on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). The Mardie Salt & Potash Project, located on the western seaboard of Western Australia, is the primary point of interest for BCI Minerals Ltd. The mission of the Mardie Project is to bring into existence a substantial, enduring operation for salt and potash. As noted in the linked update for the Mardie Project, remarkable strides have been made in its progression (ZXhang, Haxo, and Mat, 2023). Noteworthy achievements include completing a definitive feasibility study (DFS), revealing the project’s financial feasibility. The DFS presents the potential of the Mardie Project to evolve into one of the planet’s grandest operations for salt and potash, with an envisaged mining lifespan extending beyond 50 years. BCI Minerals Ltd has engaged in active dialogue with various interested parties, including potential off-take collaborators, to foster the project’s development phase. It has also secured environmental endorsements for the Mardie Project, thus manifesting its commitment to sustainable development methodologies. The company’s focus is to evolve the project in an environmentally sound manner, emphasizing reducing the project’s ecological footprint. Besides the Mardie Project, BCI Minerals Ltd has additional exploration and development projects in its repertoire, though the search results provided need more specific details on these projects. BCI Minerals Ltd is an exploration and mining corporation primarily centred on the Mardie Salt & Potash Project in Western Australia. The company has realized significant milestones, such as completing a definitive feasibility study and acquiring environmental approvals for the Mardie Project. BCI Minerals Ltd is committed to responsible mining practices and is dedicated to sustainably developing the project.


BCI Minerals Ltd.’s premier initiative, the Mardie Salt & Potash Project, is situated on the western coast of Pilbara, Australia.

Primary Commodity:

The primary commodities to be produced by the Mardie Salt & Potash Project are salt and SOP (Sulfate of Potash).

Future Price Outlook:

Future Price of Salt

For 2023, salt’s lowest projected cost is $0.038969 per unit, while the anticipated average is $0.048711 per unit. The forecast for 2024 predicts a surge, with the bottom price climbing to $0.071443 per unit and the mean price poised at $0.081185 per unit, signifying a substantial upswing relative to the previous year. As we advance to 2025, the minimum price is slated to elevate to $0.103917 per unit, with the average price landing at $0.113659 per unit, indicating a bullish trend in salt pricing. Fast-forward to 2026, we predict the minimum price to touch $0.13639 per unit, and the average cost to ascend to $0.146133 per unit (Washbourne, 2018), suggesting an enduring escalation in the value of salt, possibly a consequence of interplaying factors like market demand-supply, cost of production, or prevailing market circumstances.

Future Price of SOP

Projections for the worldwide potassium sulphate (SOP) market anticipate an annual compounded growth rate (CAGR) of 5% during the predictive span of 2023 to 2028. This infers a favourable trajectory for the market, potentially opening avenues of prospects for stakeholders and investors in the industry.

Ownership of CEO/MD and Board of Directors:

CEO/MD Ownership:

Kerry Stokes, the CEO and Managing Director holds a significant ownership stake in the company. Kerry Stokes had 236,750,238 equities in the company, which represented approximately 19.5% of the total equities.

Board of Directors Ownership:

  • Brian O’Donnell: Serving as the Non-Executive Chairman for 8.5 years, he has an ownership stake in the company, holding 0.095% of the company’s shares. He also directly owns 1,156,254 ordinary shares and 112,219 Performance Rights.
  • Christopher Salisbury: Serving as an Independent Non-Executive Director for 1.9 years, no specific information is available regarding his ownership percentage. However, he has no direct ownership of ordinary shares, Performance Rights, or Share Rights.
  • Garret Dixon: Holding the position of Independent Non-Executive Director for 2.8 years, no specific information is available regarding his ownership percentage. He also has no direct ownership of ordinary shares, Performance Rights, or Share Rights.
  • Richard Court: As an Independent Non-Executive Director for 2.3 years, he owns approximately 0.068% of the company’s shares. He also directly owns 819,768 ordinary shares and 81,309 Performance Rights.
  • Gabrielle Bell: Being a Non-Executive Director for less than a year, no specific information is available regarding her ownership percentage.
  • Miriam Stanborough: As a Non-Executive Director for less than a year, she owns approximately 0.00049% of the company’s shares. She also directly owns 5,896 ordinary shares.

Other Directors’ Ownership:

A Vorster: Directly owns 7,768,642 ordinary shares and 4,024,082 Share Rights.

M Blakiston, J Bloom, G Dixon, and C Salisbury do not have any direct ownership of ordinary shares, Performance Rights, or Share Rights.

Largest Two Investors and Shareholdings:

Investor 1: The largest investor in BCI Minerals Ltd. is Australian Capital Equity Pty Ltd.

Shareholding: Investor 1 holds  39.31%.

Investor 2: The second-largest investor in BCI Minerals Ltd. is  AustralianSuper Pty. Ltd.

Shareholding: Investor 2 holds 13.94%

Part A 2

ESG Costs and Benefits Associated with Project Development:

Benefits of ESG in project development:

  • Enhanced reputation and brand value: Companies that prioritize ESG factors in their projects can build a positive reputation, attract investors, and gain the trust of stakeholders.
  • Improved risk management: Integrating ESG considerations helps identify and manage potential risks, such as environmental impacts, social conflicts, or regulatory non-compliance, reducing the likelihood of costly setbacks and legal issues.
  • Access to capital: Many investors, including institutional investors, consider ESG performance when making investment decisions (Kyriakogkonas, 2022). Strong ESG practices can attract money and lower the cost of capital for projects.
  • Innovation and efficiency: ESG considerations can drive innovation, leading to the development of more sustainable and efficient processes, technologies, and products.
  • Stakeholder engagement: Engaging with stakeholders, including Indigenous communities, can lead to positive relationships, collaborations, and shared value creation, fostering long-term project success.

Costs and challenges associated with ESG in project development:

  • Upfront investment: Implementing ESG measures may require additional upfront investments, such as adopting cleaner technologies, conducting impact assessments, or implementing sustainable practices. Yet, these expenses may frequently be counterbalanced by long-term advantages.
  • Regulatory compliance: Conforming to ESG norms and regulations might lead to compliance costs, including tracking, reporting, and possible penalties for non-compliance. Staying informed on pertinent laws and guaranteeing compliance is crucial.
  • Stakeholder consultation and engagement: Engaging with Indigenous communities and other stakeholders requires resources, time, and efforts to ensure meaningful and inclusive participation. Failing to engage with Indigenous Australians adequately can lead to reputational damage and project delays.
  • Potential project modifications: ESG considerations may require improvements or practice changes to minimize environmental impacts, respect cultural heritage, or address social concerns. These modifications could result in additional costs or project delays.

Indigenous Australians:

When considering the development of projects in Australia, including any potential issues relevant to Indigenous Australians, there are several key factors to consider:

  • Land Rights and Traditional Owners: Respect for Indigenous land rights and consultation with Traditional Owners is crucial (Panozzo, 2023). Developers should engage in meaningful dialogue, consider cultural heritage, and obtain appropriate approvals.
  • Cultural Impacts: Development projects should assess and mitigate potential impacts on Indigenous cultural heritage, sacred sites, and cultural practices. This may involve conducting impact assessments and implementing protective measures.
  • Economic Opportunities: Projects that involve Indigenous communities should aim to create economic opportunities, such as local employment, skills development, and business partnerships, to support sustainable economic growth and social well-being.
  • Social and Health Impacts: The project should consider potential social and health impacts on Indigenous communities and work towards minimizing negative consequences. This may involve addressing issues like access to healthcare, education, and social services.

Part B

Accounting, Market, and Project Valuation Implications:

Accounting Implications:

When considering accounting implications related to a project, several factors need to be taken into account, including revenue recognition and asset valuation; specific accounting implications related to the effects of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on financial statements can be identified. Given the uncertain and challenging business environment caused by the pandemic, entities affected by COVID-19 need to carefully assess the impact on their financial statements for periods ending after December 31, 2019 (Argilés-Bosch, García-Blandon, and Ravenda, 2023). The implications include considerations related to revenue recognition, impairment of assets, going concern assessments, fair value measurements, and disclosures, among others. When acknowledging income, organizations could encounter difficulties deciding the moment and quantity of revenue recognition owing to interruptions in their operations, shifts in consumer habits, supply chain complications, and the general economic decline. There could be scenarios where the timing of revenue recognition requires deferral or adjustment to mirror the financial conditions of the system accurately.

Asset valuation is another important accounting implication. Entities may need to assess the recoverability of their assets, including property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets. The decline in market values, changes in future cash flow projections, and impairment indicators should be carefully evaluated to determine if asset impairments are necessary.

Market Implications:

The project mentioned in the provided link does not directly discuss market implications. Nonetheless, from a more comprehensive perspective, undertakings can wield considerable influence over markets, encompassing supply-demand interplay and competitive landscape.

A triumphant initiative may lead to an amplified supply or enhanced efficiency in a specific market sector, possibly inciting shifts in supply-demand relationships (Mirovic, 2023). If the initiative heralds novel technology, manufacturing methodologies, or cost diminutions, it can upset prevailing market frameworks, thereby provoking alterations in price points, market dominion, and overall rivalry. Furthermore, the fruition of an initiative can lure new contenders into the market arena, fuelling heightened competition. Increased competition can lead to market fragmentation or consolidation, depending on the specific circumstances. Market participants need to monitor these dynamics and adapt their strategies accordingly.

Project Valuation:

Project valuation involves assessing the financial worth of a project by considering factors such as projected cash flows, cost of capital, and potential risks (Venkataraman, and Pinto, 2023). While the provided link does not directly discuss project valuation, it is a crucial aspect of project evaluation and decision-making. When valuing a project, projected cash flows play a vital role. Estimating future cash flows requires careful consideration of various factors, including revenue growth rates, operating costs, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements. Sensitivity analyses and scenario planning can help capture the inherent uncertainties associated with these projections.

The cost of capital is another critical factor in project valuation. It represents the required return on investment and considers the risk associated with the project. Capital expenditure encompasses aspects like the risk-free rate, market risk premium, and elements of risk particular to the project. An escalated cost of capital signifies a heightened risk level, which could influence the evaluation and decision-making procedure. In addition to cash flows and the cost of capital, potential risks need to be assessed in project valuation. Risks can include market-related, operational, regulatory, and other uncertainties that may impact the project’s financial performance. Evaluating and quantifying these risks helps determine appropriate risk-adjusted discount rates and estimate the project’s net present value or internal rate of return. In summary, accounting implications related to the project encompass revenue recognition and asset valuation considerations. Market implications involve assessing potential impacts on supply-demand dynamics and market competition. Project valuation entails evaluating projected cash flows, cost of capital, and potential risks. By carefully analyzing these factors, stakeholders can make informed decisions regarding the project’s financial viability and possible outcomes.

Investment Analysis and Valuation:

Current Share Price and Market Capitalization:

BCI Minerals Limited (BCI) is trading at a share price of $0.230, with no change reported for the day, indicating a 0.000% change. The trading volume stands at 17,299 shares. BCI shares’ current spread is between $0.230 and $0.235. Boasting a market cap of $278.64 million, BCI Minerals actively participates in the materials industry sector. Its inaugural listing on the stock exchange dates back to December 15, 2006.

Investment Decision:

An investment in BCI Minerals Ltd. requires careful consideration, underpinned by additional in-depth study and evaluation. The following elements are crucial to consider:

  • Prospects of the Project: With a definitive feasibility study (DFS) showing economic feasibility, the Mardie Salt & Potash Project is promising (Jiang, Peng, and Yan, 2023). The study further suggests the project could evolve into one of the globe’s primary salt and potash operations.
  • Market Prospects: A favourable future pricing forecast for salt and SOP (Sulfate of Potash) is a good indicator. Nonetheless, a broader assessment of these commodities’ market dynamics and supply-demand interplay is imperative. Detailed market analysis should encompass competitive forces, pricing trends, and possible disruptions.
  • ESG Elements: The firm’s commitment to sustainable growth and responsible mining is commendable (Pinto, 2023). However, it’s vital to weigh the advantages and disadvantages associated with ESG execution and to identify any potential threats or complications that may surface.
  • Leadership and Ownership: Insights into the firm’s governance and the CEO/MD’s and Board of Directors engagement can be gleaned from understanding the ownership structure. It’s critical to evaluate the credentials and history of key players to gauge their capacity to realize the firm’s strategic goals.
  • Fiscal Performance and Valuation: The shared data does not give a holistic view of BCI Minerals’ financial performance, growth potential, or profitability. Investors should study the firm’s financial reports, including revenue, expenditures, and cash flow, to assess its financial robustness and valuation.
  • Industry and Competitive Environment: Evaluating the outlook for the materials, mining, and exploration industry, as well as the competitive terrain in which BCI Minerals is active, is vital. Understanding industry trends, competitive strengths, and potential hazards can assist in assessing the company’s long-term prospects.

BCI Minerals Ltd has several positive attributes that make it worth considering for investment. The company demonstrates promising financial performance with significant revenue and positive cash flow. Its flagship project, the Mardie Salt & Potash Project, shows potential for long-term profitability. Additionally, BCI Minerals emphasizes responsible mining practices and has a substantial ownership structure.


  • Project Capabilities: With its Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) completed, the Mardie Salt & Potash Project has demonstrated exceptional promise. The DFS has shown economic feasibility and the project’s potential to ascend as one of the world’s dominant salt and potash operations. The DFS completion is a critical marker that infuses confidence in the project’s feasibility and long-term profitability prospects.
  • Commodity Pricing Forecast: Future pricing for salt and SOP (Sulfate of Potash) indicates an upward trajectory, projecting augmented prices in the forthcoming years. Factors such as supply-demand interplay, production expenditures, and prevailing market conditions influence the escalation in salt prices. The expected expansion rate of the global potassium sulphate (SOP) market also signals potential opportunities for the company.
  • ESG Factors: The commitment of BCI Minerals towards responsible mining methodologies and sustainable development is commendable. Prioritizing ESG aspects could elevate the company’s standing, attract investment, and offset potential risks. By engaging stakeholders and enacting sustainable practices, BCI Minerals can foster positive relationships, lay the groundwork for long-term project success, and tap into the capital from ESG-centric investors.
  • Leadership and Ownership: The substantial ownership of CEO/MD Kerry Stokes symbolizes a robust alignment of interests with shareholders. It’s critical to evaluate key individuals’ track records and expertise, such as the CEO/MD and the Board of Directors, to gauge their efficacy in implementing the company’s strategic objectives.
  • Financial Health and Assessment: While detailed financial performance data isn’t provided, it’s crucial to thoroughly review the company’s financial statements, encompassing income, outlays, and cash flows, to gauge its financial wellness and worth. Investors should carefully examine the firm’s profit margins, the potential for growth, and fiscal solidity when formulating informed investment decisions.
  • Industry and Competitive Outlook: It’s crucial to assess the perspective for the materials, mining, and exploration industry and the competitive environment in which BCI Minerals operates. Comprehending industry trends, competitive strengths, and potential hazards can offer insights into the company’s long-term prospects and its capacity to flourish in a competitive marketplace.


To summarize, BCI Minerals Ltd stands as an Australian entity committed to mining and exploration, with a central emphasis on the Mardie Salt & Potash Project situated in Western Australia. The firm has reached considerable benchmarks in project development, notably the accomplishment of a definitive feasibility study and obtaining environmental consent. The Mardie Project holds immense potential to become one of the world’s largest salt and potash operations, with a mine life exceeding 50 years. BCI Minerals is committed to responsible mining practices and sustainable development, as demonstrated by their engagement with stakeholders and dedication to minimizing the project’s environmental impact. The company’s focus on ESG factors can enhance its reputation, attract investors, and mitigate potential risks. The future price outlook for salt and SOP indicates a positive trend, with projected price increases over the coming years. This bodes well for the Mardie Project and its potential profitability. Additionally, the significant ownership stake of CEO/MD Kerry Stokes aligns the company’s leadership with shareholder interests. However, before making any investment decisions, further research and analysis are crucial. Investors should carefully evaluate the market dynamics, industry outlook, competitive landscape, and the company’s financial performance and valuation. Assessing these factors will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the investment opportunity presented by BCI Minerals Ltd and its Mardie Salt & Potash Project.


(No date a) BCI Minerals Limited (ASX: BCI) share price, News & Information – Listcorp. Available at: (Accessed: 20 May 2023).

(No date) Available at: (Accessed: 20 May 2023).

Argilés-Bosch, J.M., García-Blandon, J. & Ravenda, D., (2023). A critical approach to the evaluation of the quality of accounting research in the Spanish university system and its implications.

BCI Minerals Limited – Mardie Project Update. Retrieved from

BCI Minerals Limited Mardie Salt and potash project (2023) NAIF. Available at: (Accessed: 20 May 2023).

BCI Minerals Limited. BCI Minerals website. Retrieved from:

Introduction (no date) Introduction – BCI Minerals. Available at: (Accessed: 20 May 2023).

Jiang, Z., Peng, C. & Yan, H., (2023). Personality differences and investment decision-making (No. w31041). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kyriakogkonas, P., Garefalakis, A., Pappa, E. & Kagias, P., (2022). Sustainable Project Management under the Light of ESG Criteria: A Theoretical Approach. Theoretical Economics Letters, 12(6), 1517-1538.

Mardie (no date) Mardie – BCI Minerals. Available at: (Accessed: 20 May 2023).

Mardie Salt Project. NS Energy Business. Retrieved from:

Mirovic, V., Kalas, B., Djokic, I., Milicevic, N., Djokic, N. & Djakovic, M., (2023). Green Loans in Bank Portfolio: Financial and Marketing Implications. Sustainability, 15(7), 5914.

Overview (no date) Overview – BCI Minerals. Available at: (Accessed: 20 May 2023).

Panozzo, S., Bryan, T., Mason, T., Garvey, G., Lethborg, C., Boughey, M. & Philip, J.A., (2023). Bridging cultures in palliative care: A qualitative study of the care of Indigenous Australians with advanced illness. Palliative Medicine, 02692163221137929.

Pinto, M.C., Crespi, G., Dell’Anna, F. & Becchio, C., (2023). Combining energy dynamic simulation and multi-criteria analysis for supporting investment decisions on smart shading devices in office buildings. Applied Energy, 332, 120470.

Venkataraman, R.R. & Pinto, J.K., (2023). Cost and value management in projects. John Wiley & Sons.

Washbourne, M., (2018). BCI adds salt to the tasty project mix. Australia’s Paydirt, 1(262), 74.

ZXhang, Y.X., Haxo, Y.M. & Mat, Y.X., (2023). BCI BCI MINERALS LIMITED. AC Investment Research Journal, 220(44).

Related Posts

Leave a comment

× WhatsApp Us